The Kimmel Complaint and the Culture War Collision
What happens when conservative outrage crashes into federal bureaucracy? In the case of FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr’s complaint against Jimmy Kimmel, it demonstrates what occurs when ideological stunts morph into real governmental actions—with unintended consequences and a surprising lack of direction.
This curious episode, where Carr attempted to use the FCC as a political cudgel against a late-night comedian, isn’t merely a sideshow. It’s a revealing look into how the conservative media ecosystem operates, and how hollow victories can reveal deeper fissures, particularly when it comes to winning the very audience they claim to represent.
A Manufactured Culture War Flashpoint
It all began with a joke—specifically, a Kimmel monologue poking fun at conservative commentators’ attempts to win military hearts and minds. Kimmel quipped that the military should recruit transgender influencers like TikTok star Dylan Mulvaney, which promptly became a prime target for conservative commentators like Pete Hegseth and Charlie Kirk.
But rather than limit the response to performative media outrage, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr took an unprecedented step: he filed an official complaint, demanding that the FCC investigate Kimmel’s show for potentially violating broadcast decency standards.
Weaponizing Bureaucracy for Clout
Carr’s decision was more than just a tweet-friendly moment—it was an effort to institutionalize the culture wars. By invoking the FCC, Carr pushed the limits of regulatory authority in service of political signaling. While meant to appeal to the right-wing base, the move exposed the ideological contradiction at the heart of the effort. Carr essentially argued that the FCC should censor a comedian for mocking right-wing political actors.
Ironically, that’s the kind of government overreach conservatives traditionally rail against.
So what was the goal? That’s the bigger issue: Carr’s play seemed less about actual concern for broadcast standards and more about impressing a sphere of online influencers, podcast hosts, and cable pundits.
The “Based” Echo Chamber Response
What followed Carr’s announcement was largely predictable. Right-leaning influencers hailed him as “based,” a term used online to denote defiant, unapologetic bravery against perceived woke opponents. Tweets and memes proliferated. Kudos flowed in from MAGA-world figures and conservative media figures.
But this is where the story takes a bizarre and revealing turn.
Despite the hero treatment online, Carr’s complaint didn’t result in a formal FCC investigation. Why? Because Kimmel’s show airs on ABC, a network protected by broad First Amendment rights. Crucially, the segment that drew Carr’s ire aired during hours outside the FCC’s “safe harbor” rules for content regulation.
In other words, Carr filed a complaint designed to fail.
The Pitfall of Owning the Libs
This incident illustrates a recurring issue in conservative media’s culture war playbook: elevating performative rage over strategic, legal, or institutional impact. Carr’s gesture was aimed at garnering applause from Fox News hosts and Twitter activists—but left him no closer to achieving policy change or compelling accountability.
Even more tellingly, Carr’s complaint may have weakened his credibility within the FCC itself. By treating a legitimate regulatory agency like a stage for partisan theater, he undermines the agency’s apolitical mandate.
Right-Wing Media: Great at Rage, Terrible at Recruitment
This saga is just one example of the broader trend: conservative figures like Hegseth and Kirk position themselves as champions of the military, yet their actions often contradict policies that would support military recruitment.
For instance, Hegseth has repeatedly railed against LGBTQ representation in the military, calling it a distraction. But studies show that inclusive military outreach can boost recruitment numbers—especially among younger Americans, who are increasingly diverse in their identities and values.
Their message: “We support the troops, but only if they look, act, and vote like us.”
The result: Alienating a younger generation facing an already volatile recruiting environment.
Picking Battles Without a Strategy
Carr’s failed FCC complaint reveals a broader problem within the conservative media ecosystem: a tendency to prioritize outrage and headlines over coherent strategy. In trying to “own the libs” and punish Kimmel for a joke, Carr deleted the line between partisan media warfare and federal governance.
And in doing so, he may have done more damage to the conservative cause than any late-night joke could have.
Four Lessons from the Kimmel FCC Saga
The episode offers some key takeaways:
- 1. Political Stunts Are No Substitute for Policy: Filing complaints might energize the base, but it won’t compel change without legal grounding.
- 2. The First Amendment Still Matters: Even when it protects speech conservatives dislike. Weaponizing the FCC against criticism is a dangerous precedent, regardless of who’s in charge.
- 3. Culture War Optics Don’t Recruit Soldiers: Alienating younger Americans might score cheap points online, but it weakens actual military readiness.
- 4. Institutions Aren’t Props: Using agencies like the FCC for culture war cosplay dilutes public trust and undermines their long-term credibility.
Conclusion: Catching the Car, But Now What?
There’s an old expression about dogs chasing cars—they don’t know what to do once they catch one. Brendan Carr, by elevating a bad joke on late-night TV to a federal issue, ended up in precisely that position. He filed a complaint he likely knew would go nowhere, gained momentary praise from his ideological peers, and yet accomplished nothing of substance.
If the goal was greater respect for conservatism in media or fairness in public discourse, this was not the route to get there. Until conservative culture warriors decide that long-term strategic wins matter more than short-term social media applause, they’ll keep repeating this cycle: grab headlines, lose ground, and ultimately, diminish the causes they claim to champion.
In the end, Carr didn’t catch Kimmel—he caught himself in a feedback loop where action matters less than the applause it generates.
Leave a Reply